We need a paradigm shift in education data to build the learning generation
The Inter-agency and Expert Group on SDG Indicators is meeting to review the frameworks and work plans needed to help deliver on the pledges made for 2030.
March 30, 2017 by Bridget Crumpton, The World Bank, and Silvia Montoya, UNESCO Institute for Statistics
|
8 minutes read
Victor Muntagu, head teacher, Chavuma Secondary School in Zambia. Credit: GPE/Carine Durand
Victor Muntangu, head teacher at Chavuma Secondary School in Zambia, collects data on his students' performance to identify challenges. This data is transmitted to the Ministry of Education to inform policy-making. In Victor's words, "policies that come from the ground are very effective."

Ambitious goals demand more and better data, which is why the Inter-agency and Expert Group on SDG Indicators is meeting today in Ottawa. Experts from countries and international agencies including the UNESCO Institute for Statistics (UIS) are once again reviewing the frameworks and work plans needed to help deliver on the pledges made for 2030. 

The good news is that just about everyone agrees on the strength and value of the education indicators. The challenges lie in producing them and disseminating them in a way that they are actively used. We couldn’t agree more.  

As highlighted in the Education Commission report, Sustainable Development Goal 4 (SDG 4) on education cannot be achieved without solid evidence.

To show the way forward, a new paper, prepared for the Commission by UIS makes the case for a data revolution in education based on three pillars:

  • Create enabling environments in which communities, governments, and civil society use the data to take action and to foster accountability.
  • Produce high-quality internationally-comparable data by supporting the work of UIS in developing the standards, methodologies and indicators needed to monitor progress globally while keeping governments, donors and stakeholders accountable.
  • Strengthen data dissemination and use by governments, communities and civil society to increase accountability through a range of mechanisms, such as open data practices, new information technologies for data storage and presentation, and greater data integration and systematic exchange of information between different levels of government and other institutions.

The Education Commission and UIS also emphasize four areas in which better monitoring and accountability are needed.

- All children must be made more visible in education statistics, including those who are not reflected by today’s data, such as children uprooted by war, those with disabilities, orphans and other vulnerable groups.

- There must be enough data to monitor progress towards SDG 4, particularly on equity. International household survey programs should be harmonized so that comparable education indicators can be produced on school attendance, attainment, literacy, expenditure, equity and other key issues.

- Learning assessments must be reconciled within a common framework, and we need better coordination to reduce transaction costs. The paper argues for a participatory process that enhances and leverages results from sound national learning assessments, ensures their implementation through international technical guidance, and secures adequate external funding for international reporting of quality-assured assessment data.

- Data on education finance must cover all sources of funding. Together with the International Institute for Education Planning UIS developed National Education Accounts (NEAs) as a methodology to cover all sources of funding. The challenge now is to help countries use this tool to track who is spending what on education.

What are the specific steps?

The first step entails sustainable funding and commitment to finding common solutions and methodologies. We need a transparent, inclusive and participatory approach to ensure the best possible monitoring of progress towards SDG 4, and that education data take their rightful place as public goods and policy tools.

We must also clarify roles and responsibilities on education monitoring, so that there is no overlap of functions and all actors are engaged to their maximum advantage. At the international level, UIS proposes that the Technical Cooperation Group on the Indicators for SDG 4 ‐ Education 2030 (TCG) requires support to sustain its leadership in developing and applying the frameworks and indicators needed to monitor the education targets.   

One task of the group would be to revise national platforms for reporting to UIS to ensure the provision of data required to monitor SDG 4. 

At the national level, we need improved statistical capacity, better coordination between regional and international agencies and alignment with national policies.  Governments and international agencies need to better support national capacity to collect, produce and disseminate education data. 

At the private sector level, we need to mobilize the private IT sector to support countries.

Equipping countries with the basic IT they need to collect, process and disseminate education data would cost just 0.002% of the total annual revenues of the 14 biggest IT companies.

For UIS to fulfil its roles, we must also increase its funding, as the global source of SDG 4 data, as well as support the full monitoring capacity of the UN (such as UNESCO, UNICEF, the Global Education Monitoring Report, and the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights and UN High Commissioner for Refugees). The Education Commission specifically calls on development partners to increase support for the UIS, which works on a daily basis with countries to help them implement the indicator frameworks and remedy setbacks in larger efforts to achieve the global education goal.

The vision set out by UIS and the Education Commission is ambitious – there is no denying that improving education data is a gradual process that could take years.

However, a radical shift is feasible if international organizations provide technical support, foster coordination and back the production of data as a global public good. Joint efforts can drive the change needed to foster the Learning Generation.  

Read: The Data Revolution in Education

Related blogs

Classes should have periodic performance reviews done by outside teams as some concepts are not even taught in classes. Children go through i.e. math classes (years as 3-4) without understanding the main concepts.Actions should be taken at the time when something happens rather than over the years; there are technologies available to easy off children's learning curve as well as reporting their results. In addition there are quality management systems as Lean Six Sigma that have the tools to provide what has been missing across the entire Education ecosystem

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. All fields are required.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Comments

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.