Data and inclusion in education
Various global education commitments aim to ensure the rights of children with disabilities, but the lack of reliable data, especially in the Asia-Pacific region, hinders the fulfillment of this crucial obligation.
If disability data provide only a glimpse into the everyday education challenges experienced by learners with disabilities, such data nonetheless can serve as a critical starting point for developing evidence-based policies, as well as for monitoring the implementation of the Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities (CRPD, 2008).
According to UNESCAP, the Asia-Pacific region—with some 4.3 billion people, or roughly 60% of the world’s population—is home to nearly 650 million persons with disabilities, with 1 in every 6 individuals in the region living with disabilities.
UNICEF estimates that nearly 43 million children with disabilities live in East Asia and the Pacific. These children encounter some form of exclusion in all countries across the region, and access to fundamental services, like education and medical care, remains limited or unavailable to many of them—especially those living in remote areas.
The 2020 GEM Report emphasizes the prioritization of the Washington Group Short Set of Questions and the Child Functioning Module as essential data collection tools. Additionally, the GEM Report underscores the significance of administrative systems collecting data that facilitates effective planning, budgeting and delivery of inclusive education services.
The UIS Information paper outlines the significance of utilizing UIS, Education Management Information Systems (EMIS) and survey data to monitor inclusive education, especially for budgeting, resource planning, individual education plans and the guiding of policies.
The importance of data was recognized in the 2022 Global Disability Summit, which noted the need to gather and utilize better data and evidence by employing established tools to reach a comprehensive picture of the scale and nature of these challenges.
Similarly, a recommendation in the Household Survey Data on Disability and Education in GPE partner countries indicated a need for better data on disability and education for creating and implementing inclusive education policies, and for allocating resources equitably.
The findings also highlight the significance of gathering data to support evidence-based and inclusive policymaking and planning, emphasizing the need for data to effectively monitor global advancements in inclusive education.
The Jakarta Declaration also acknowledges the continuing lack of reliable data and information on the situation of persons with disabilities and aims to take action to close the gaps and strengthen capacities to track progress in disability-inclusive development at the national and subnational levels.
This is to be facilitated by producing comparable and quality data disaggregated by gender, age and disability across sectors to inform disability-inclusive policy making.