Over 36 million refugees around the globe, many of whom are school-aged children, continue to grapple with the instability that defines their new reality. Each step they take—from crossing international borders seeking safety to navigating the complex pathways toward education and local integration—is fraught with uncertainty.
With protracted crises causing prolonged periods of displacement, the inclusion of refugees within national education systems can help mitigate this uncertainty and equip them with the tools to rebuild their lives.
Still, the path to full inclusion is marked by several challenges.
Two reports by UNESCO and UNHCR analyzing data and policies in the top 35 low- and middle-income refugee-hosting countries found that while most countries (75%) grant refugees access to national education systems, policies often lack provisions to ensure longer-term, sustainable solutions.
Furthermore, refugees remain largely invisible in education statistics, especially concerning education safety and quality, due in part to an absence of questions that allow for the identification of refugees in existing data collection exercises. This hinders the effective monitoring of their educational progress and impedes the development of targeted responses to meet their educational needs.
There are 7 in-depth case studies complementing the reports by UNESCO and UNHCR that reveal the barriers and opportunities to fostering full inclusion of refugees within host countries’ education systems. They underscore the need to use both national and international systems-level levers to build more inclusive education systems for refugees, echoing the 2023 Global Refugee Forum commitments to foster greater refugee inclusion in host countries.
The case studies highlight 5 system-level levers for refugee inclusion: political will, inter-agency coordination, the capacity of national systems, financing and international cooperation. With financing and international cooperation being the focus of discussions at the 2023 forum, this blog focuses on 3 national-level levers: political will, inter-agency coordination and the capacity of national systems.