Where does the right to education stop?
Now may be the time to discuss how governments will implement their obligations to fulfil the right to education in line with new Global Goals
December 10, 2015 by Elin Martinez, Human Rights Watch
|
6 minutes read
Jacinta, 15, was excluded from school after authorities found out that she was pregnant © 2014 Marcus Bleasdale/VII for Human Rights Watch

Have you ever heard children telling you they want their education to stop when they reach the end of primary school?

I have interviewed hundreds of children in many countries and not a single one of them has ever said ‘enough!’

For many of these children, having their education stopped short at the end of primary school was tragic. For some, external factors such as violence or discrimination forced them to drop out. For children with disabilities, it was about not accessing education on an equal basis with other children. For girls, the sudden onset of puberty often brought the bad news that schools were not safe enough for them or the threat of being married off illegally.

Many adolescents are shut out of secondary schools because, they are told, there are not enough places or schools are too far for them. Many cannot afford the prohibitive costs associated with secondary school.

Some turn to hazardous work to scrape together some money to pay for some of their education and support their families.

These stories add up to the 124 million children around the world who are not in primary or secondary school, and hundreds of thousands more who may physically be in school but not getting a quality education. They each represent a government’s failure to guarantee the right to education.

Is the problem with the law? Does the right to education fall short of protecting the right of all children to go, not just to primary, but also secondary school?

It is the wrong question

The evidence we have gathered over the years suggests this is the wrong question to ask.

The right to education—protected in more than five international United Nations treaties, legally binding on any state that ratifies them —provides the strongest guarantee of the right to education at all levels. The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, the most universally ratified treaty, has celebrated the protection of the right to education for over 25 years. Many governments have constitutional or national protections in place to guarantee this right to all populations.

Governments have a fundamental obligation to ensure primary education is free and compulsory – which in simple terms means the government should ensure all children are in school, with no exceptions.

Perhaps it is less well known that governments also have a clear international obligation to guarantee different forms of secondary education, make them available and accessible to every child and introduce free secondary education or offer financial assistance in case of need. 

This year all governments signed up to development commitments that go even further. With the UNESCO-sponsored Incheon Framework of Action and the fourth Sustainable Development Goal on education, governments committed to ensure that all children have 12 years of free education, 9 of them compulsory, by 2030.  

This is the right question

The better question is: why have governments not implemented the right to education fully?

As a very first step, governments need to look at the reasons why many primary school children continue to face indirect fees through various expenses — for example paying for uniforms, teachers’ additional salaries, use of buildings, to name a few—that block many from attending. They should address the causes of and remove those financial barriers and, where the practice persists, stop schools from charging illegal fees.

Our evidence shows that the absence of special legal protections to stamp out different forms of discrimination in education – against girls, children with disabilities, LGBT children, children from ethnic or language minorities, among others—continues to drive children out of the school gates.

Among other gaps, explicit obligations to reasonably accommodate children with disabilities, to prohibit early marriages, or to guarantee the right to secondary education, are largely missing in many constitutions or national frameworks.

The Incheon Declaration says: “we acknowledge the efforts made; however, we recognize with great concern that we are far from having reached education for all.”

There will never be “education for all” so long as the right to education—at the secondary as well as the primary level—is not adequately protected in law and practice. The international community should use this global momentum to ensure governments have put in place all the legal measures and rights-respecting development plans to ensure no child is denied primary or secondary education in the next 15 years.

Related blogs

Dear Elin,
Your article seems to attack the State (Government) indirectly. You are partially right. But all the Governments had made legislation for Free Education till secondary stage. I am speaking of India.
But what do parents expect from their little children? Is it not good and quality education?
In my opinion if EDUCATION IS FOR ALL it will be possible only by A. Attitude of the parents and 2. Dedication of the existing teachers.
Hence let us educate parents first with the help of teachers and then passion for education will lit their homes.

Thank you for this article Elin. You have raised what appears to be an under-appreciated but highly important point that the failure tends to lie in implementation, not law (although issues exist there, too). From my experience working in a highly marginalised community in rural India for the last 9 years, rights and laws have be introduced but, outside of the project I am involved with, little has changed for the children of the community.

Implementation issues include non-supporting of rural teachers (who are sometimes vilified rather than empathised with), not understanding how the curriculum needs to meet the specific needs of first generation rural learners, and critically meaningfully engaging the community in the process seem to be largely overlooked. In fact parents are often blamed, as our Learned pervious commenter has kindly demonstrated.

This is misleading, unfairly blames extremely poor parents who are highly disenfranchised from democratic processes, and diverts the debate away from where it really needs to be - in understanding systems failure and how this can be addressed.

Until the debate looks at implementation, implementation will not improve. Thank you for bringing more attention to this.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. All fields are required.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Plain text

  • Global and entity tokens are replaced with their values. Browse available tokens.
  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.